In my game, we have adopted the humblest likely swing and have claimed that as many shots as likely should be played with basically the same movements. Now that we have outlined the idea of teaching by feeling you will improve understand why we attach such a position to this point.
Now, these four ideas together make up the top of the swing, and we were talking about the waggle—which is the bottom of an unreal swing! But do not think we were digressing. We were not, the two…
In my game, we even have adopted the only possible swing and have insisted that as many shots as possible should be played with fundamentally equivalent movements. Now that we even have outlined the thought of teaching by feeling you’ll better understand why we attach such importance to the present point.
Now, these four points together structure the highest of the swing, and that we were talking about the waggle—which is that the bottom of an imaginary swing! But don’t think we used to be digressing. We were not, the 2 are linked together. And why? Because unless you are feeling the entire of the swing in your waggle, your waggle is failing in its purpose.
This controlling feel is made up through the constant repetition of the right movements. We don’t know just where within the system it resides, but whether it’s muscular memory or the wearing of certain grooves or channels within the mind, or—as is probable—a combination of the 2, it’s obvious that the more often an equivalent succession of movements are often repeated the clearer the memory is going to be. Also, and this is often most vital, the memory shouldn’t be confused by the frequent or maybe occasional introduction of other and different movements—as happens when the swing is fundamentally changed surely shots.
It is mainly for this reason that I teach and preaches and practices that each shot from the complete drive to the putt should be played with an equivalent movement. in fact within the drive the movement is both more extensive and bolder than for the shorter shots, but fundamentally it’s an equivalent. The result must be a sense of “in-to-out” stroking across the face of the ball—played not at the ball, but through it. The “in-to-out” refers to the relation of the texture of the trail of the clubhead to the specified line of flight of the ball.
The only shots in golf which I even have been unable to play or to show as sections of the elemental “in-to-out” swing are certain shots which involve cut pulled under and across the ball.
But for ninety-nine out of each hundred shots, a golfer must play, the swing is that the movement necessary. So to clear the bottom we will be able to list what I concede to be the essentials of the swing:
- it’s essential to show the body round to the proper then back and round to the left, without moving either way. In other words, this turning movement must be from a hard and fast pivot.
- it’s essential to stay the arms at full stretch throughout the swing—through the rear swing, the downswing, and therefore the follow-through.
- it’s essential to permit the wrists to interrupt fully back at the highest of the swing.
- it’s essential to delay the particular hitting of the ball until as late within the swing as possible.
- it’s essential to not tighten any muscle concerned within the reactive part of the swing (movement above the waist).
- it’s essential to feel and control the swing as an entire and to not concentrate upon any a part of it.
In a sense, this last point is that the most significant. The swing must be considered and felt as one unity, not as a succession of positions or maybe a succession of movements. The swing is one and indivisible.
Now I consider that our golf is susceptible to failure if we lose sight of any of those essentials. There are innumerable incidentals that would be added that are important enough to possess a substantial influence on one’s game, but we will be able to go thus far on saying that if you’ve got these six essentials well embedded in your system and if you’ve got developed some conscious control of your swing by getting the texture of the proper movements—your game will rarely or never desert you.
Of course, the comfortable, reliable, right feel isn’t a thing that comes all directly. as an example, it takes years—though not if your teacher teaches by feel—to
feel nicely set and cozy before the ball; weight between the feet, perfectly free and active and yet firmly planted.
Then the waggle. About the waggle, an entire book might be written. Every movement we make once we waggle may be a miniature of the swing we shall make. The clubhead moves in response to the body and therefore the body opposes the club head. it’s a flow and counter flow of forces with no static period, no check.
There is no check anywhere during a good swing. there’s no such thing because the “dead top” of a swing—there are four points all of which could be so considered if it weren’t for the opposite three! They are: (1) When the pivot (feet to shoulders) has reached its top, the arms are still rising. (2) When the arms have reached their top, the body is on its day down. (3) When the arms begin to return down, the wrists have still to interrupt back, and (4) When the wrists break
To put the lesson of the concept of control by feel as briefly as possible, we must hand over brooding about our shots. in situ thinking there must be conscious control, obtained by the build-up (by constant repetition of the right action) a cushty and reliable feel, a feel which will tell you infallibly through appeal to your muscular memory, what’s the proper movement —and which can remain with you and control your shots whatever your psychological state could also be. Not being a matter of thought, this control stands outside the psychological state.